This update may potentially break your usage of add-hook! if you pass
the :local or :append properties to it. This is how they used to work:
(add-hook! :append 'some-mode-hook #'do-something)
Thsoe properties must now follow the hooks, e.g.
(add-hook! 'some-mode-hook :append #'do-something)
Other changes:
- Various add-hook calls have been renamed to add-hook! because I
incorrectly assumed `defun` always returned its definition's symbol,
when in fact, its return value is "undefined" (so sayeth the
documentation). This should fix#1597.
- This update adds the ability to add multiple functions to hooks
without a list:
(add-hook! 'some-mode-hook
#'do-something
#'do-something-else)
- The indentation logic has been changed so that consecutive function
symbols at indented at the same level as the first argument, but forms
are indent like a defun.
(add-hook! 'some-mode-hook
#'do-something
#'do-something-else)
(add-hook! 'some-mode-hook
(message "Hello"))
This commit does two things:
- Renames def-advice! to defadvice!, in the spirit of naming convenience
macros after the function/macro they enhance or replace.
- Correct the names of advice functions to indicate visibility and
intent. A public advice function like doom-set-jump-a is meant to be
used elsewhere. A private one like +dired--cleanup-header-line-a
shouldn't -- it likely won't work anywhere but the function(s) it was
made to advise.
Calling this pivotal macro "def-package!" has frequently been a source
of confusion. It is a thin wrapper around use-package, and it should be
obvious that it is so. For this reason, and to match the naming
convention used with other convenience macros/wrappers, it is now
use-package!.
Also changes def-package-hook! -> use-package-hook!
The old macros are now marked obsolete and will be removed when straight
integration is merged.
The state of peer programming in Emacs isn't great. The floobits module
is only one line of code and doesn't warrant its own module.
impatient-mode is a little more useful, but is too niche and not
exclusively for peer programming, so I'm not convinced it belongs in
this category. Since there are no other good options, I'm just getting
rid of the category altogether.
